The Southern District of West Virginia offers a database of opinions starting in the year 2001, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search to the right or sort using the drop-downs below.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending is Defendant Donna Dean-Chrivia’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice the Third Amended Class Action Complaint [Doc. 1040], filed September 19, 2024, along with additional motions identified and adjudicated at the conclusion of this written opinion and order. Plaintiff Sabrina Eagle responded to the Motion to Dismiss on October 3, 2024, [Doc. 1076]. The matter is ready for adjudication.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending are Defendant Tyler Sizemore’s Amended Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment [Doc. 17], filed July 1, 2024, Motion to File Brief in Excess of Page Limit for Memorandum in Support [Doc. 18], filed July 1, 2024, Motion to Stay [Doc. 24], filed July 30, 2024, and Supplemental Motion [Doc. 38], filed October 1, 2024. Plaintiffs responded to the Amended Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment on July 19, 2024, [Doc. 21], to which Mr. Sizemore replied on July 30, 2023, [Doc. 23]. The matters are ready for adjudication
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending is Defendants’ Justin L. Faris, Summers County Commission, and Summers County Sheriff’s Department Motion to Dismiss [ECF 11], filed February 21, 2024. Plaintiffs Dottie J. New and Ralph New (collectively “the News”) responded in opposition [ECF 13] on March 6, 2024, to which Defendants replied [ECF 14] on March 13, 2024
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending is Defendants West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“WVDCR”), Aaron Johnson, Johan Radosevich, Ashley Toney, and Nicholas Burton’s(hereinafter, together “the WVDCR Defendants”) Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Supplemental Rule 26(a)(2) Disclosures [Doc. 233], filed March 1, 2024.1 Plaintiff Miranda Dawn Smith, on behalf of the Estate of Alvis Ray Shrewsbury, responded on March 8, 2024 [Doc. 241], to which the WVDCR Defendants replied on March 18, 2024 [Doc. 247]. The matter is ready for adjudication.
ORDER
Pending before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants Charleston Hospital, Inc., Herbert J. Thomas Memorial Hospital Association, THS Physicians Partners, Inc., Thomas Health System, Inc., and Brian Ulery ("Defendants"). [ECF No. 56]. Plaintiff Relator Liesa Kyer ("Relator") responded, [ECF No. 60], and Defendants timely replied, [ECF No. 61].
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending is Defendant Kenyata E. Smith’s Letter-Form Motion to Seal or Expunge
Record [Doc. 27], filed August 8, 2022.
Ms. Smith seeks expungement of her misdemeanor criminal conviction solely on
equitable grounds, namely that the conviction’s appearance in the National Instant Criminal
Background Check System (“NCIS”) report is interfering with her ability to obtain employment...
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending is Defendant Greenbrier Outfitters, Inc. d/b/a Broadmoor Outfitters’ (“Broadmoor Outfitters”) Motion to Set Aside Default [Doc. 12], filed May 10, 2024.
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pursuant to a Notice to Appear for Petit Jury Service sent by the United States District Clerk’s office on April 16, 2024, Michael Lee Roselle was instructed to report for petit jury service in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia on April 29, 2024.
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending is Plaintiff Priscilla Felton’s Motion to Remand [Docs. 6, 7], filed September 13, 2023. Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”) filed its Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. 11] on September 27, 2023, to which Ms. Felton replied [Doc.12] on October 4, 2023. The matter is ready for adjudication.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
This case involves a proposed medical monitoring class action against Defendants Union Carbide Corporation and Covestro, LLC, as the owners and operators of a manufacturing facility (the “Plant”) in South Charleston, West Virginia, for alleged emissions of ethylene oxide (“EtO”), a known carcinogen. Plaintiff and proposed class members reside in neighborhoods surrounding the Plant, and their lawsuit is based on an alleged significant increase in their risk of developing cancer as a result of the Defendants’ alleged EtO emissions.