The Southern District of West Virginia offers a database of opinions starting in the year 2001, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search to the right or sort using the drop-downs below.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending are Defendant Deputy Commissioner G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 47], and Plaintiffs Ann Barclay deWet and Laurence E.T. Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 51], both filed September 22, 2023.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending is Defendant Paul Richard Massey’s Motion to Modify Sentence [ECF 83], filed January 8, 2024. The Government responded on January 16, 2024 [ECF 86]. The matter is ready for adjudication.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending are Plaintiff Komatsu Financial Limited Partnership’s (“Komatsu”) (1) Renewed Motion for Order of Payment By Southern Coal Corporation (“Southern”) to Komatsu Pursuant to Suggestion [ECF Nos. 182-2; 220], filed April 28, 2023, and (2) First Amended Motion for Further Proceedings Pursuant to W. Va. Code § 38-5-18 on James C. Justice Companies, Inc.’s (“JCJC”) Answer to Suggestion (“First Amended Motion”) [ECF 199], filed May 31, 2023.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary filed by Defendant Ranger Scientific, LLC (“Ranger”) [ECF No. 51], and Plaintiff North Avenue Capital, LLC (“NAC”), [ECF No. 53]. Because the motions raise substantially similar arguments in favor of summary judgment, I will dispose of them together. For the reasons stated herein, NAC’s Motion [ECF No. 53] is DENIED, and Ranger’s Motion [ECF No. 51] is GRANTED.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Disqualify Next Friends. [ECF No. 341]. Plaintiffs have responded in opposition. [ECF No. 359]. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is DENIED.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending before the court is Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. [ECF No. 318]. For the reasons explained below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 42]. The motion offers several arguments in favor of dismissal, but the dispositive issue in this case is whether the intra-military immunity doctrine deprives this court of jurisdiction over the claims asserted by Plaintiff, a dual-status technician with both military and civilian roles. For the reasons explained below, I find that it does. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
Memorandum Opinion And Order
Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 5], and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 13].
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Granting Motion to Adjust Payment Plan Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k)
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending before the court is a Motion for Charging Order filed by Plaintiff SFG Commercial Aircraft Leasing, Inc. (“SFG”). [ECF No. 28]. For the reasons set forth herein, SFG’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.